A Roadmap to Business Research
This chapter seeks to constitute a roadmap or framework to guide business researchers in contextualizing and planning their research efforts. A literature study was conducted to investigate the research concept, the boundary of research, and the research process’ conceptual framework. This chapter summarized research as a systematic investigation to reveal new knowledge. In guiding industry-orientated business research, it is acknowledged that management action may solve some business problems. In contrast, higher levels of organizational issues and critical reflection of business issues may require actual research.
The framework for business research is divided into four parts: the research problem, research design, empirical evidence, and conclusion. The central part of the map is the design section that organizes the philosophic approach (theoretical foundation, research philosophy, and assumptions) on the one side and the applied research methods and techniques on the other side, with the research methodology acting as a bridge between the sides. The framework constitutes a guide when embarking on the journey to solve industry-orientated business research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save
Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (France)
eBook EUR 74.89 Price includes VAT (France)
Softcover Book EUR 68.56 Price includes VAT (France)
Hardcover Book EUR 94.94 Price includes VAT (France)
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Business Research Process
Chapter © 2014
What is the Metaverse? Challenges, Opportunities, Definition, and Future Research Directions
Chapter © 2023
Basic Research Methods
Chapter © 2018
Notes
AS illustrated later, it must be noted not every business problem needs to be solved by scientific research.
Note that although conceptually four distinct elements, in actuality these ProDEC elements are highly integrated.
Note that the theoretical foundation may not be of equal importance in all paradigms, e.g., the pragmatist and design sciences paradigms where a pragmatic problem solution or artifact is the primary objective.
References
- Abutabenjeh, S., & Jaradat, R. (2018). Clarification of research design, research methods, and research methodology: A guide for public administration researchers and practitioners. Teaching Public Administration,36(3), 237–258. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research. Thomson/ Wadsworth. Google Scholar
- Brierley, J. A. (2017). The role of a pragmatist paradigm when adopting mixed methods in behavioural accounting research. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance,6(2), 140–154. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Collins. (2021). Definition of research. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/research Date of access: 21 July 2021.
- Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed method research. Sage. Google Scholar
- Davis, C., & Fisher, M. (2018). Understanding Research Paradigms. JARNA,21(3), 21–25. Google Scholar
- Delen, D., & Zolbanin, H. M. (2018). The analytics paradigm in business research. Journal of Business Research,90, 186–195. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Department of Education and Training, Western Sydney University. 2020. Research services.https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/research/researchers/preparing_a_grant_application/dest_definition_of_research. Date of access: 21 July 2021.
- Elsayed, N., & Elbardan, H. (2018). Investigating the associations between executive compensation and firm performance: Agency theory or tournament theory. Journal of Applied Accounting Research,19(2), 245–270. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- FindAPhD.com. (2021). What are the criteria for a PhD?https://www.findaphd.com/advice/finding/criteria-for-phd.aspx Date of access: 18 August 2021.
- Goldkuhl, G. (2011). Design research in search for a paradigm: Pragmatism is the answer. European Design Science Symposium (pp. 84–95). Springer. Google Scholar
- Goldkuhl, G. (2020). Design Science Epistemology: A pragmatist inquiry. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems,32(1), 39–79. Google Scholar
- Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2011). The practice of qualitative research. Sage. Google Scholar
- Henderson, K. A. (2011). Post-positivism and the pragmatics of leisure research. Leisure Sciences,33(4), 341–346. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J. & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS quarterly: 75–105. Google Scholar
- Kessler, E. H. (Ed.). (2013). Encyclopedia of management theory. Sage. Google Scholar
- Kankam, P. K. (2019). The use of paradigms in information research. Library & Information Science Research,41(2), 85–92. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kekeya, J. (2019, November). The commonalities and differences between research paradigms. Contemporary PNG Studies: DWU Research Journal,31, 26–36. Google Scholar
- Kivunja, C. (2018). Distinguishing between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework: A systematic review of lessons from the field. International Journal of Higher Education,7(6), 44–53. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal for Higher Education,6(5), 26–41. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jansen, J. D. (2020a). What is a research question and why is it important? In: Maree, K., (ed.), First steps in research. Van Schaik. pp. 2–14. Google Scholar
- Jansen, J. D. (2020b). Introduction to the language of research. In: Maree, K., (ed.), First steps in research. Van Schaik. pp. 16–24. Google Scholar
- Lexico.com. (2021). Oxford English and Spanish dictionary, synonyms, and Spanish to English translator. https://www.lexico.com/definition/research Date of access: 22 July 2021.
- Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 97–128). Sage. Google Scholar
- Myers, M. D. (2020). Qualitative research in business & management. Sage. Google Scholar
- Mouton, J. (1996). Understanding social research. Van Schaik. Google Scholar
- Mouton, J. (2011). How to succeed in your master’s & doctoral studies: A South African guide and resource book. Van Schaik. Google Scholar
- Nieuwenhuis, J. (2020). Introducing qualitative research. In: Maree, K., (ed.), First steps in research. Van Schaik. pp. 56–76. Google Scholar
- Pandey, P. & Pandey, M. M. (2015). Research methodology: Tools and techniques. Bridge Center: Buzau. Google Scholar
- Pietersen, J. & Maree, K. (2020). Statistical analysis II: Inferential statistics. In: Maree, K., (ed.), First steps in research. Van Schaik. pp. 242–258. Google Scholar
- Rahi, S. (2017). Research design and methods: A systematic review of research paradigms, sampling issues and instrument development. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences,6(2), 1000403. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rehman, A. A., & Alharthi, K. (2016). An introduction to research paradigms. International Journal of Educational Investigations,3(8), 51–59. Google Scholar
- Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students. Pearson. Google Scholar
- Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action Design Research. MIS Quarterly,35(1), 37–56. Google Scholar
- Tubey, R. J., Rotich, J. K., & Bengat, J. K. (2015). Research paradigms: Theory and practice. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences,5(5), 224–228. Google Scholar
- Vom Brocke J., Hevner A., Maedche A. (2020). Introduction to Design Science Research. In: Vom Brocke J., Hevner A., Maedche A. (eds.), Design Science Research. Cases. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46781-4_1 Date of access: 21 October 2021.
- Voxco. (2022). Business research: Definition, types, and methods. https://www.voxco.com/blog/business-research-definition-types-and-methods/ Date of access: 23 May 2022.
- Wilson, J. (2013). Essentials of business research: A guide to doing your research project. Sage. https://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/59838_Wilson_ch1.pdf Date of access: 3 June 2021.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Management Cybernetics Research Entity, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa Merwe Oberholzer & Pieter W. Buys
- Merwe Oberholzer